home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1998-07-16 | 92.2 KB | 1,196 lines |
- PDS_VERSION_ID = PDS3
- RECORD_TYPE = FIXED_LENGTH
- RECORD_BYTES = 80
- SPACECRAFT_NAME = "CLEMENTINE 1"
- TARGET_NAME = {EARTH, MOON, SKY}
- OBJECT = TEXT
- INTERCHANGE_FORMAT = ASCII
- PUBLICATION_DATE = 1994-10-1
- NOTE = "CLEMENTINE MISSION"
- END_OBJECT = TEXT
- END
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Clementine Mission
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Assembled from many sources by:
-
-
-
-
- Eric Eliason
- Planetary Data System - Imaging Node
- Branch of Astrogeology
- United States Geological Survey
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- October 1, 1994
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
-
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. CLEMENTINE EDR IMAGE ARCHIVE
- 3. MISSION TIME LINE
- 4. THE SCIENTIFIC PAYLOAD
- 5. LUNAR ORBITAL DYNAMICS
- 6. INITIAL SCIENTIFIC RESULTS
-
- APPENDIX I - Lunar Orbit Time Line
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 1. Introduction
-
- During the past decade, the Department of Defense and the Ballistic
- Missile Defense Organization, BMDO (formally the Strategic Defense
- Initiative, SDIO) of the US Department of Defense (DOD) have invested
- heavily in space technology, focused on the development of lighter, more
- cost effective components and systems for spacecraft. In May of 1990,
- the NASA Discovery Science Working Group endorsed a study of
- incorporation of SDIO developed technology into civilian scientific
- missions. In September 1990, NASA Administrator Richard Truly formally
- inquired of Deputy Secretary of Defense Donald Atwood as to the
- possibility of utilizing the advanced, lightweight technologies being
- developed by the Department of Defense in a joint space exploration
- mission. After a six month effort by NASA, DOD, and industry, it was
- concluded that a mission to a near-Earth-asteroid was desirable and
- feasible from both organizations' standpoint. In addition to the
- scientific value of an asteroid flyby and of the potential benefit of
- technology transfer between the agencies for NASA, there was clear
- benefits to DOD. In early 1992 the mission was incorporated into the
- Ballistic Missile Defense Organization Sensor Integration Program. The
- mission was subsequently expanded by two months to include mapping of
- the Moon to demonstrate spacecraft and sensor performance prior to the
- demanding asteroid flyby mission. The interstage adapter of the
- spacecraft, housing the solid rocket motor, was also designated as a
- platform to remain in highly eccentric earth orbit as a radiation
- experiment platform and additional sensor target.
-
- The Clementine spacecraft was built at the US Naval Research Laboratory
- in Washington, DC, and carried sensors, attitude control systems and
- software designed and built by the Lawrence Livermore National
- Laboratory (LLNL). The USAF supplied advanced lightweight composite
- structures and the launch vehicle, a Titan II B refurbished ICBM.
- Several other organizations were involved, especially NASA with
- communications support, through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's (JPL)
- Deep Space network, and orbit determination and operations support from
- both the Goddard Space Flight Center and JPL. Supporting these
- laboratories were scores of industrial contractors, both large and
- small.
-
- The spacecraft consists of an octagonal prism about 2 meters high. A
- 110-pound thruster for delta-V maneuvers is on one end of the prism and
- a high-gain fixed dish antenna is on the other end. The spacecraft
- propulsion system consists of a nonpropellant hydrazine system for
- attitude control and a bipropellant nitrogen tetraoxide and monomenthyl
- hydrazine system for the maneuvers in space. The bipropellant system had
- a total capability of about 1.9 km/s with about 550 m/s required for
- lunar insertion and 540 m/s for lunar departure. The power system
- consists of a gimbaled, single axis, GaAs/Ge solar array providing a
- total spacecraft power of 360 watts at 30 Vdc, with a specific power of
- 240 w/kg, based on lightweight construction. Two arrays of the rotating
- solar panels protrude from opposite sides; by rolling the spacecraft and
- rotating the panels, full solar illumination of the panels would be
- achieved. The solar array was used to charge a 15 A-h, 47-w hr/kg, Nihau
- common pressure vessel battery. The total mass of the spacecraft in the
- launch configuration was 1690 kg, with most of the weight in the solid
- rocket motor required for translunar insertion. The spacecraft dry mass
- is about 227 kg, with a roughly equal mass for liquid fuel. This weight
- was achieved by incorporating many of the previously discussed
- lightweight technologies.
-
- The main instrumentation on Clementine consists of four cameras, one
- with a laser-ranging system. The cameras include an ultraviolet-visual
- (UV-VIS) camera, a long-wave infrared (LWIR) camera, the laser-ranger
- (LIDAR) high-resolution (HiRes) camera, and a near-infrared (NIR)
- camera. The spacecraft also has two star tracker cameras, used mainly
- for attitude determination, but they also serve as wide-field cameras
- for various scientific and operational purposes. The sensor package has
- a mass of 8 kg and represents the state-of-the-art at the initiation of
- the Clementine program. The sensors are all located on one side, 90
- degrees away from the solar panels. Clementine has 12 small attitude
- control jets that were used to orient the spacecraft to point the
- cameras to desired targets. The attitude control system includes the two
- star tracker cameras and two lightweight inertial measurement units,
- based on a ring laser gyro and an interferometric fiber optic gyro.
- During initial deployment at low-earth-orbit, the full size spacecraft
- was 3-axis stabilized. The spacecraft was 3-axis stabilized in lunar
- orbit via reaction wheels, with a precision of 0.05 Deg. in control and
- 0.03 in knowledge.
-
- The spacecraft data processing was performed by 3 computing systems. A
- MIL-STD-1750A computer with a capacity of 1.7 million instructions per
- second was used for save mode, attitude control system, and housekeeping
- operations. A reduced instruction set computer (RISC) 32-bit processor
- with 18 million instructions per second was used for image processing
- and autonomous operations. The Clementine mission represents the first
- long duration flight of a 32 bit RISC processor. Also incorporated is a
- state-of-the-art image compression system provided by the French Space
- Agency CNES. A data handling unit with its own microcontroller sequenced
- the cameras, operated the image compression system, and directed the
- data flow. During imaging operations, the data were stored in a 3 kg, 2
- Gbit dynamic solid state data recorder and later transferred to the
- ground stations using a 128 kb/s downlink. The spacecraft was commanded
- from the ground using a 1 kb/s uplink from the NASA Deep Space Network
- and DOD stations. Demonstration of autonomous navigation including
- autonomous orbit determination was a major goal of the Clementine
- mission. Autonomous operations were conducted in lunar orbit.
-
- 2. Clementine EDR Image Archive
-
- The Clementine EDR (Engineering Data Record) Image Archive will contain
- approximately 100 CD-ROM volumes for distribution to the science
- community. Each volume will contain approximately 3 lunar orbits but may
- vary in the number of orbits depending on the size of each orbit. The
- first volume in the series begins with orbit 32--the start of the lunar
- mapping phase of the mission. The Low Earth orbit, and earth phasing
- loop image data will be generated on the volumes at the end of the
- volume series.
-
- Additional documentation exists on the CD-ROM volume series that
- describe the organization and content of the Clementine EDR Image
- Archive. Please see the EDRSIS and ARCSIS documents located in the
- <document> directory. The EDRSIS document provides a detailed
- description of the format of the image files that are contained in the
- archive. The ARCSIS document describes the organization of the
- volumes.
-
- 3. Mission Time Line
-
- Clementine was launched on January 25, 1994 from Vandenburg Air Force
- Base aboard a Titan IIG rocket. After two Earth flybys, lunar insertion
- was achieved on February 19-th. Lunar mapping took place over
- approximately 2 months in two systematic mapping passes over the Moon
- (See Lunar Orbital Dynamics section for more details on systematic
- mapping and Appendix I showing a table of the Lunar orbit time lines.)
- Table 1 provides a synopsis of the mission time line.
-
- After successfully completing the Lunar mapping phase of the mission,
- Clementine suffered an on-board malfunction at 9:39 AM EST, Saturday,
- May 7, 1994. The result of the malfunction prevented Clementine from
- performing the planned close flyby of the near-Earth asteroid Geographos
- scheduled for August 1994. Preliminary analysis traced the cause of the
- malfunction to the on-board computer which controls most of the
- satellite's systems including the attitude control thrusters. The
- computer activated several thrusters during a 20 minute telemetry
- interrupt with the ground station, thus depleting all the fuel in the
- Attitude Control System (ACS) tanks. With the depletion of the ACS
- tanks, the spacecraft was left spinning at 80 revolutions per minute
- with no remaining fuel left to despin the spacecraft.
-
- Table 1 - Mission Time line Summary
-
- 3/24/1992 - Clementine Design Begins
- 1/25/1994 - Spacecraft launched at Vandenburg Air Force Base
- 2/ 3/1994 - Departure from low Earth orbit following an
- eight day checkout period
- 2/19/1994 - Following two phasing loop orbits, Clementine
- injected into lunar orbit. Lunar orbit shake down
- period begins.
- 2/26/1994 - Start of systematic mapping for first cycle.
- 3/26/1994 - First mapping cycle complete, start of second cycle
- 4/21/1994 - Second mapping cycle complete, begin special
- observations.
- 5/ 5/1994 - Leave Lunar Orbit
- 5/ 7/1994 - Clementine satellite suffered on-board malfunction
- that prevents planned close fly-by of the near-Earth
- asteroid Geographos
- 8/31/1994 - Planned Geographos Fly-by (not accomplished)
-
- 4. The Scientific Payload
-
- UV-Visible Camera: The UV-Visible camera has a catadioptic telescope
- using fused silica lenses focusing onto a metachrome-coated CCD imager.
- Active wavelength response is limited on the short wavelength end by the
- transmission of fused silica and the optical blur of the lens.
- Wavelength response on the long end is limited by the response of the
- CCD. Six spectral bands can be selected from a filter wheel which is
- controlled through the same serial-addressable synchronous interface
- (SASI).
-
- The Thomson focal plane array (FPA) used is a frame-transfer device,
- accomplishing electronic shuttering by rapidly shifting the active pixel
- area into the storage area, pausing for the (13-bit programmable)
- integration time, then rapidly shifting the captured image into a
- storage buffer from which the image is read out. Post-FPA electronics
- allow three gain states followed by 5 bits of offset that span 248
- counts in the analog regime to augment the basic 8-bit A/D conversion.
- Gain is A/D digitization noise limited, so proper exposure is critical.
- Working against the day side of the Moon as a target, typical
- integration times were as short as several milliseconds in the lowest
- gain state (1000 electrons/bit) near sub-solar illumination points at
- the brighter spectral bands, increasing to 40 msec near the polar
- regions in the mid-gain setting for the weaker 415 and 1000 nm spectral
- bands. The UV-Visible Performance specifications are shown in Table 2.
-
- Wide Field of View Star Trackers: The star tracker cameras have a
- concentric optics design with a fiber optic field flattener to couple
- the image surface to a CCD array. The CCD is kept cleared by
- continuously shifting lines and reading out pixels at the 5 MHz base
- rate, which is approximately 100 microseconds per line. Integration is
- accomplished by stopping this clearing process for the specific time
- (13-bit programmable), then proceeding with a second line-shifting
- operation into a readout buffer line and completing readout at 5 MHz.
- Camera electronics are identical to those of the UV-VIS camera, with the
- gain circuit resistors selected to be slightly more sensitive.
-
- The primary function of the star tracker cameras was to provide stellar
- images that were processed against an onboard star catalog to find
- pointing, thus establishing absolute angular references for navigation.
- The scientific uses of the cameras were secondary. Only broad band
- operation was available. Owing to the line-transfer electronic
- shuttering, imaging was limited to dim targets such as the lunar surface
- illuminated by earth shine. System noise is about 1.0 bits rms at the
- highest sensitivity setting. The star tracker camera performance
- specifications are provided in Table 3.
-
- High Resolution Imaging (HiRes) camera: The HiRes camera combines a
- lightweight beryllium telescope with an image intensifier-coupled frame
- transfer CCD imager. Image shuttering is accomplished through voltage
- gating of the image intensifier. Maximum integration time is 733
- milliseconds in 10.67 microsecond increments. Spectral response is
- limited in the system by the S-2 photocathode between 0.4 and 0.8
- microns. Five spectral bands can be selected from a filter wheel which
- is controlled through the same SASI interface. A sixth filter position
- is allocated to an opaque filter for the image intensifier's protection.
-
- The post-FPA electronics circuitry is identical to that used in the UV-
- VIS camera. Images of the day side of the moon used intensifier gate
- times with relatively low gain settings on the order of 1 millisecond.
- Lifetime concerns about the photocathode and micro channel plates in the
- intensifier unit drove operational settings to low exposures. This
- resulted in photon shot noise significantly contributing to the overall
- noise in the HiRes sensor. The HiRes performance specifications are
- provided in Table 4.
-
- Laser Rangefinder (LIDAR): The LIDAR unit shares the telescope of the
- HiRes camera, splitting the 1064 nm return signal from the NdYag source
- off to an avalanche photodiode (APD) detector with dichroic filter. The
- optics are non-imaging, providing an exit pupil through simple relay
- optics at the APD. The APD electronics includes a temperature
- compensation feature for the APD bias voltage and programmable
- thresholding of the output signal. The APD current is amplified and
- inverted to a voltage by a transimpedance amplifier with a gain of 230X,
- a low frequency cutoff of 3 MHz, and a high frequency cutoff of 23 MHz.
- The APD current is amplified, then discriminated for changes (increase)
- through 14 MHz discriminator. Voltage changes exceeding the programmed
- threshold are flagged as returns.
-
- Range value is determined by the clock cycles since a laser output
- sampled start pulse is received. The clock counter has only 14 bits
- owing to the hardware availability limitations. In order to allow
- returns up to the 640 km maximum range required in the lunar mission,
- returns from the discriminator are binned 4 to a clock count, turning
- the 23 MHz response into a 40 meter height bin. Internal memory in the
- LIDAR unit saves up to 6 "returns" per laser firing, with up to 4 saved
- between programmable search range minimum/maximum values. Threshold is
- set for the best compromise between missed detection and false alarms.
- The LIDAR components are summarized in Table 5.
-
- Near Infrared Camera (NIR): The NIR camera uses a catadioptric lens with
- a 256x256 indium antimonide (InSb) FPA mechanically cooled to cryogenic
- temperature. The FPA operated at 70 plus-or-minus 0.5 K at the Moon and
- showed excellent stability over the more than 500 hours of operation in
- space. The lens design features all ZnSe refractive elements with a
- relay to provide an external pupil for 100% efficient cold shielding.
- This lens design was chosen for image quality and focus stability.
- Wavelength range was constrained by the optics and the InSb response to
- somewhat less that 1.0 to 5.5 microns. Six wavebands were selected by
- the NASA advisory committee, all falling well inside this range.
-
- Camera electronic programmable variables allow 4 integration times, 5
- bits of gain, and 8 bits of offset. Gain states are spaced approximately
- evenly from 0.5 to 36 factors of voltage multiplication. Offset is
- subtracted before gain is applied with 0 V to full well range that can
- be set in 1/255 full well increments. The NIR camera performance
- specifications are shown in Table 6.
-
- Longwave Infrared Camera (LWIR): The LWIR camera uses a catadioptric
- lens with a 128 x 128 mercury cadmium telluride (HCT) FPA. The FPA was
- mechanically cooled to cryogenic temperatures during operation with a
- temperature set point goal of 65 K. The optics design incorporates an
- internal relay with 100% cold shield efficiency. Wavelength ranges was
- controlled by the cold filter to 8.0 to 9.5 microns.
-
- Camera electronic design is virtually identical to the NIR camera, with
- a minor alteration in line readout to compensate for the difference in
- column count between the two arrays (256 for the NIR, 128 for the LWIR).
- The NIR and LWIR cameras also share a common cryocooler and dewar
- design, with minor modifications made to accommodate cold shield and
- cold filter differences. The LWIR Performance Specifications are shown
- in Table 7.
-
-
- Table 2 UV/Visible Performance Specifications
-
-
- Focal Plane Array:
- Type Si Charge Coupled Device
- Thomson TH7863-CRU-UV
- Pixel format 288x384
- Pixel size 23x23 microns
- Readout rate 4MHz
-
- Optics:
- Clear aperture 46nm
- Speed F/1.96
-
- Imaging:
- Wavelength 0.3 to 1.1 microns
- Field of view 4.2 deg. x 5.6 deg.
- Pixel IFOV 255 microradians
- Point spread 1.1 to 1.5 pixels
- Filters 415nm cw (plus-or-minus 20 nm bw)
- 750nm (plus-or-minus 5)
- 900nm (plus-or-minus 10)
- 950nm (plus-or-minus 15)
- 1000nm (plus-or-minus 15)
- 400 to 950 broad band
-
- Camera Electronics:
- A/D resolution 8 bits
- Frame rate 10 Hz
- Readout time 27.4 ms
- Integration time 0.2-733 ms
- Digitization gain 150,350,1000 electrons/count
- Offset control 248 gray levels
- Power 4.5 W
-
- Mechanical:
- Mass 410 grams
- Envelope 15.5cm x 11.7 cm x 10.4 cm
-
- Common Module Filter Wheel System:
- Type 6 position, 90 deg. stepper motor driven,
- Hall effect position sensors
- Step and Settle time < 250ms
- Position repeatability < 10mr
- Power 0.15 W quiescent, 11.0 W stepping
-
-
-
- Table 3 Star Tracker Performance Specifications
-
-
- Focal Plane Array:
- Type Si Charge Coupled Device
- Thomson TH7863
- Pixel format 576x384
- Pixel size 23x23 microns
- Readout rate 5MHz
-
- Optics:
- Clear aperture 14nm
- Speed F/1.3
-
- Imaging:
- Wavelength 0.5 to 1.1 microns
- Field of view 43 deg. x 28 deg.
- Pixel IFOV 1.3 microradians
- Point spread 2 pixels
-
- Camera Electronics:
- A/D resolution 8 bits
- Readout time 54.8 ms
- Integration time 0.2-733 ms
- Digitization gain 75, 150, 350 electrons/count
- Offset control 248 gray levels
- Power 4.5 W
-
- Mechanical:
- Mass 290 grams
- Envelope 11.7 cm x 11.7 cm x 13.2 cm
-
-
-
-
- Table 4 HiRes Imaging Receiver Performance Specifications
-
- Focal Plane Array:
- See UV/Visible specifications in Table 1, except arrays are not UV
- enhanced.
-
- Optics:
- Clear aperture 131 nm
- Speed F/9.5
-
- Imaging:
- Wavelength 0.4 to 0.8 microns
- Field of view 0.4 deg. x 0.3 deg.
- Pixel IFOV 18 microradians
- Point spread 4 pixels
- Filters 415 nm cw (plus-or-minus 20 nm bw)
- 560 nm cw (plus-or-minus 5)
- 650 nm cw (plus-or-minus 5)
- 750 nm cw (plus-or-minus 10)
- 400 to 800 nm broad band
-
- Image intensifier:
- Image intensifier module General Atomics 0131-Z12-2-009
- Useful photocathode diameter 12 mm
- Luminous gain 1000 fL/fC
- Limiting resolution 40 lp/mm
- Gain control 8 bits
-
-
-
- Camera Electronics:
- See UV/Visible specifications in Table 1
- Power 9.5 W
-
- Mechanical:
- Mass 1120 grams
- Envelope 17.0 cm x 18.1 cm x 36.4 cm
-
-
-
- Table 5 LIDAR Components
-
- Detector:
- Type Si APD C30954E, 0.4 to 1.1 micron
- Pixel format single APD
- Pixel size 0.5 mm2
- Pixel FOV 1.0 mrad diameter
- APD gain 100 X nominal
- Transimpedance amplifier 230 X gain; 3 MHz to 23 MHz response
-
- Optics:
- Shared path wit HiRes Camera. Dichroic beamsplitter. Exit pupil matched
- to APD. Mass and envelope included in HiRes description.
-
- Camera Electronics:
- Range Resolution 40 meter
- Detection signal derivative
- Detection criteria programmable threshold (8 bits)
-
- Laser Transmitter:
- Wavelengths 532 nm/1064 nm
- Pulse energy 171 mJ @ 1064, 9 mJ @ 532 nm
- Pulse width < 10ns
- Beam divergence < 500 mrad @ 064 nm, 4 mrad @ 532 nm
- Shot profile Continuous @ 1 Hz, 400 shots @ 8 Hz
-
- Laser Transmitter Optics:
- Type 5X Galilean-type telescope
- Clear Aperture 38 mm exit diameter
- Start pulse detector Analog Modules, Inc. Model 754
- Pockels cell driver Analog Modules, Inc. Model 824
- Laser diode heater Minco Kapton film resistance type; 16C to 18C
- Power 6.8 W at 1 Hz; 2.6 W quiescent
-
- Laser Transmitter Mechanical:
- Mass 635 grams laser head; 615 grams power supply
- Envelope 13.3 cm x 15.2 cm x 3.9 cm high (power supply)
-
-
-
-
-
- Table 6 NIR Performance Specifications
-
-
- Focal Plane Array:
- Type Amber PV InSb
- Pixel format 256x256
- Pixel size 38x38 microns
- Non-operable pixels < 0.5%
- FPA operating temp. 70 K
- FPA well capacity 11.7 million electrons
-
- Optics:
- Clear aperture 29nm
- Effective focal length 96 mm
- Cold stop F/3.33, 6.0 mm diameter
- Cold shield efficiency 100%
-
-
- Imaging:
- Field of view 5.6 deg. x 5.6 deg.
- Pixel IFOV 400 x 400 microrad
- Point spread > 50% energy in 30 micrometer slit
- Filters 1100 nm (plus-or-minus 30 nm)
- 1250 nm (plus-or-minus 30 nm)
- 1500 nm (plus-or-minus 30 nm)
- 2000 nm (plus-or-minus 30 nm)
- 2600 nm (plus-or-minus 30 nm)
- 2690 nm (plus-or-minus 60 nm)
-
- Camera Electronics:
- A/D resolution 8 bits
- Frame rate 7.1 Hz (single frame mode)
- Integration times 11, 33, 57, and 95 ms
- Digitization gain 0.5 to 36 X voltage multiplication
- Offset control 8 bits
- Power 13.0 W
-
- Cryocooler:
- Type Ricor K506B integral Stirling with
- H-10 FPA temperature closed-loop
- control electronics
- Avg. power 11.0 W steady-state
-
-
- Mechanical:
- Mass 1920 grams
- Envelope 10.4 cm x 11.5 cm x 36.5 cm long
-
-
-
-
-
- Table 7 LWIR Performance Specifications
-
-
- Focal Plane Array:
- Type Amber PV HgCdTe
- Pixel format 128x128
- Pixel size 50x50 microns
- Non-operable pixels < 5%
- FPA operating temp. 65 K nominal
- FPA well capacity 42 million electrons
-
- Optics:
- Equivalent clear aperture 29nm
- Effective focal length 96 mm
- Cold stop F/2.67, 7.47 mm diameter
- Cold shield efficiency 100%
-
-
- Imaging:
- Field of view 1 deg. x 1 deg.
- Pixel IFOV 143 x 143 microrad
- Point spread > 60% energy in 79 micrometer slit
-
- Camera Electronics:
- A/D resolution 8 bits
- Frame rate 52.9 Hz (single frame mode)
- Pixel rate 500kHz
- Integration times 0.115, 0.92, 2.30, and 4.60 ms
- Digitization gain 0.5 to 36 X voltage multiplication
- Offset control 8 bits
- Power 13.0 W
-
- Cryocooler:
- See NIR cryocooler specifications in Table 5.
-
-
- Mechanical:
- Mass 2100 grams
- Envelope 14.7 cm diameter x 36.1 cm long
-
-
-
-
- Preflight Calibration: Extensive pre-flight calibration data were
- acquired using an automated calibration facility at LLNL. In a typical
- calibration configuration, a sensor was mounted inside an environmental
- chamber whose temperature was set from -20 to 20 deg. C which were the
- expected operating temperatures for the mission. Depending on the
- measurement types, the sensors saw either a flat diffused light source
- or an off-axis collimator with various pinholes as the point source. A
- custom board controlled the sensor parameters from the host computers;
- the video signal was acquired using a commercial image processor. During
- data acquisition many thermal parameters such as FPA and chamber
- temperatures were monitored and recorded as part of the image
- structure. All calibration processes were fully automated enabling rapid
- data acquisition and minimization of operator error. Pre-flight
- calibration attempted to cover similar light levels expected from the
- lunar surface and spanning the same camera settings required for the
- lunar mapping phase.
-
- The pre-flight calibration measurements included radiometric
- sensitivity; FPA uniformity; gain and offset scale factors;
- temporal/spatial noise; dark noise dependence on FPA temperatures,
- integration times or input voltage levels, spectral response of FPA;
- optical distortion map; point spread function; electronic warm-up time
- and cryocooler cool down time. For the thermally sensitive sensors such
- as LWIR camera, the noise measurement was performed using a vacuum
- chamber to simulate the space thermal environment.
-
- Many pre-flight calibration coefficients were applied to lunar data
- showing reasonable agreement with expected performance. In-flight
- calibration data will allow minor corrections for vacuum flight
- condition and sensor degradation over mission lifetime to be added to
- the pre-flight calibration results. The final calibration is expected to
- be better than 5%.
-
- Data Compression: Data compression was done onboard using the CNES
- compression chip. The processing was performed on a completed, framed
- image prior to storage on the solid state data recorder (SSDR) when the
- appropriate compression flag is set.
-
- The compression chip developed by MATRA under CNES specifications is
- used in two modes, which could be selected via a software uplink
- command. The first mode optimized rms error for a nominal compression.
- The second (JPEG) provided visual optimization at a fixed compression
- rate. In the first mode, blocks of 8x8 pixel 8-bit data are transformed
- to a best fit cosine series expansion in the orthogonal row and column
- directions. This algorithm tends to preserve high frequency information
- with less data loss than does JPEG at the same compression ratio for the
- lunar data. Total signal from the 8x8 block is preserved exactly. The
- nominal amount of compression was set by limiting the scene error
- induced by compression to a fraction of the camera's temporal noises.
- Analysis of lunar images during the first part of the mission showed
- that the quantization matrix used by the chip was optimum for the
- imaging cameras. The HiRes camera, however, was operated in JPEG mode.
- The high frequency information in the HiRes scenes was spurious (it was
- caused by gain non-uniformity of the intensifier tube); eliminating high
- frequency content allowed higher compression without harming the
- information content of the scenes. The average compression rate for all
- images obtained during the mission was 5.5.
-
- 5. Lunar Orbital Dynamics
-
- Based on the characteristics of the baseline sensor complement, the
- mapping of 100% of the lunar surface was done in two lunar days (two
- Earth months). During the nominal two month mapping mission, the
- required image overlap for the UV/VIS and NIR cameras was ~15% in the
- down track and ~10% in the cross track directions. This required that
- the periselene of the lunar orbit be maintained at an altitude of 425
- plus-or-minus 25 km. In order to image 100% percent of the moon's
- surface during the two months, the spacecraft was required to be in a
- polar orbit. This requirement was satisfied with the inclination of the
- orbit at 90 degrees plus-or-minus 1 degree with reference to the lunar
- equator. To provide the necessary separation for the alternating
- imaging strips to cover the entire surface of the moon during the two
- months, the orbital period was approximately 5 hours. During this
- orbital period the moon rotated approximately 2.7 degrees beneath the
- spacecraft. The orbit also was a sufficiently long period to allow the
- transmission to Earth of data collected during the imaging phase of each
- orbit.
-
- During the lunar mapping phase of the mission, there were four separate
- observational periods. The first, orbits 1-31, was a shakedown and
- testing period where the spacecraft observation sequences were tested
- and refined. Observations of special targets, such as Apollo landing
- sites, were additionally acquired during this period. The second period,
- orbits 32-168, was the first month's systematic mapping with periselene
- in the southern hemisphere. The third period, orbits 169-297, was the
- second month's systematic mapping with periselene at the northern
- hemisphere. In the fourth period, orbits 298-348, periselene remained in
- the northern hemisphere. In this period, observations were made to cover
- gaps in coverage, acquire observations of special targets, acquire
- stereo observations over Orientale Basin, and obtain calibration data.
- Clementine left lunar orbit soon after orbit 348.
-
- The best data for lunar mineral mapping is obtained if the solar phase
- angle is less than 30 degrees. The solar phase angle is defined as the
- angle between the vector to the Sun and the vector to the spacecraft
- from a point on the Moon's surface. To maximize the time period in
- which the solar phase angle is within 30 degrees, the plane of the lunar
- orbit should contain the Moon-Sun line half way through the two-month
- lunar mapping period. Therefore, insertion into the lunar orbit was
- selected so that, as the Moon-Sun line changes with Earth's motion about
- the Sun, the Moon-Sun line will initially close on the orbital plane,
- and then lie in the orbital plane half-way through the mapping mission.
- The angle between the Moon-Sun line and the orbital plane was close for
- approximately five weeks before becoming zero. Table 8 contains a list
- of Clementine's orbital parameters
-
- Table 8 Clementine Orbital Parameters
-
- Orbital Period: 4.970 hr < P < 5.003 hr
- Radius of Periselene: 2138 km < radius < 2188 km
- Eccentricity: 0.35821 < e < 0.37567
- Right Ascension: -3 deg < Omega <+3 deg (J2000)
- Inclination: 89 deg < i < 91 deg
- Periselene: -28.4 deg < w < -27.9 deg (1st month)
- 29.6 deg < w < 29.2 deg (2nd month)
-
- Orbit determination and monitoring was done on a continuous basis
- throughout the lunar pre-mapping phase. The gravitational potential
- field of the moon has not been fully mapped, and large lunar mass
- concentrations may have had a significant perturbation effect on the
- orbit. Maintenance burns were required to maintain the orbit within the
- required envelope. The number of these burns was minimized to avoid
- unnecessary disruptions to the systematic mapping. To this end, any
- required periapsis burns were performed away from periselene in the
- direction of the near pole.
-
- Attitude measurement accuracy was necessary to determine spacecraft
- pointing to within 0.03 degree, 0.5 milliradians. This accuracy was
- achieved in real-time, in darkness or sunlight throughout the lunar
- mapping phase. The spacecraft was three-axis stabilized and capable of
- autonomous, open loop inertial pointing with an accuracy of 0.05 degree,
- 0.87 milliradian, or better. This accuracy was required to support use
- of the high resolution camera because of its narrow field of view for
- imaging selected target sites during the lunar mapping mission.
-
- The spacecraft was able to execute controlled, relative pointing motion
- about a pointing vector for scanning across targets. The relative
- pointing was capable of controlled motion of 75 microradians.
-
- During lunar imaging, the spacecraft had to maintain a NADIR pointing
- attitude. This required a greater than 180 degree rotation over the
- approximately 1.5-2.0 hour period during each lunar orbit. The
- spacecraft was also required to maintain an angular bias about the X-
- axis from NADIR to permit an imaging groundtrack parallel but offset
- from the NADIR groundtrack.
-
- The spacecraft was required to point to the Earth center, and to a
- specified tracking station site on the Earth, for the dumping of data
- using the high-gain directional antenna.
-
- To help accomplish attitude determination, the spacecraft had two
- inertial measurement units (IMU) and two star trackers. Because of a
- solar exclusion angle constraint, one of the two star trackers had to be
- covered during lunar orbit. To meet the aforementioned pointing
- requirements, during lunar orbit a star tracker image was processed and
- the spacecraft attitude knowledge was updated at 10 second intervals or
- less.
-
- 6. Initial Scientific Results
-
- Over the course of 71 days in lunar orbit, Clementine systematically
- mapped the 38 million square kilometers of the Moon in eleven colors in
- the visible and near infrared parts of the spectrum (nearly 1,000,000
- images). In addition, the spacecraft took 620,000 high resolution and
- about 320,000 mid-infrared thermal images, mapped the topography of the
- moon with a laser ranging experiment, improved our knowledge of the
- surface gravity field of the Moon through radio tracking, and carried a
- charged particle telescope to characterize the solar and magnetospheric
- energetic particle environment. All sensors on the spacecraft met or
- exceeded expectations of their performance. The first global color view
- of the Moon was acquired, major compositional provinces were identified,
- and geology and composition details were mapped.
-
- The images from Clementine constitute the first color global digital
- data set of the Moon. The NASA Science Team advised the project on the
- selection of color filters for the two principal mapping cameras: the
- UV/Visible camera and the NIR camera. The color of the Moon in the
- visible to near-infrared part of the spectrum is sensitive to variations
- in both the composition of the surface material and the amount of time
- material has been exposed to space. The Clementine filters were selected
- to characterize the broad lunar continuum and to sample parts of the
- spectrum that are known to contain absorption bands diagnostic of iron-
- bearing minerals and plagioclase feldspar, the dominant mineral
- constituents of the lunar crust. By combining information obtained
- through several filters, multispectral image data are being used to map
- the distribution of rock and soil types on the Moon.
-
- Clementine was successful in systematically mapping the Moon in these 11
- colors at an average surface resolution of about 200 meters per pixel.
- The initial examination of the data attests to its excellent quality.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- APPENDIX I - Lunar Orbit Time Line
-
- The table shown below provides a timeline for each Clementine lunar
- orbit. The table shows the orbit number (ORB), Day of Year (DOY), Date,
- UTC, Longitude of orbit at the equator (LONG), and altitude at periapsis
- (ALT).
-
-
-
- ORB DOY DATE UTC LONG ALT
-
- 1 50 02/19/94 20:25:0 103.5 401.8
- 2 51 02/20/94 04:19:2 99.2 402.2
- 3 51 02/20/94 12:13:3 94.8 402.3
- 4 51 02/20/94 20:04:4 90.5 401.6
- 5 52 02/21/94 03:56:0 86.2 401.5
- 6 52 02/21/94 11:47:1 81.9 401.5
- 7 52 02/21/94 16:46:0 79.2 396.6
- 8 52 02/21/94 21:44:5 76.4 396.6
- 9 53 02/22/94 02:43:4 73.7 396.6
- 10 53 02/22/94 07:42:4 71.0 396.6
- 11 53 02/22/94 12:41:3 68.2 382.5
- 12 53 02/22/94 17:39:5 65.5 382.6
- 13 53 02/22/94 22:38:2 62.8 382.7
- 14 54 02/23/94 03:36:4 60.0 382.9
- 15 54 02/23/94 08:35:0 57.3 383.2
- 16 54 02/23/94 13:33:3 54.6 383.6
- 17 54 02/23/94 18:31:5 51.8 384.0
- 18 54 02/23/94 23:30:2 49.1 384.5
- 19 55 02/24/94 04:28:4 46.3 385.1
- 20 55 02/24/94 09:27:0 43.6 385.8
- 21 55 02/24/94 14:25:3 40.9 386.5
- 22 55 02/24/94 19:23:5 38.1 387.4
- 23 56 02/25/94 00:22:2 35.4 388.4
- 24 56 02/25/94 05:20:4 32.7 389.5
- 25 56 02/25/94 10:19:1 29.9 390.7
- 26 56 02/25/94 15:17:3 27.2 391.9
- 27 56 02/25/94 20:15:5 24.5 393.3
- 28 57 02/26/94 01:14:2 21.7 394.8
- 29 57 02/26/94 06:12:4 19.0 396.3
- 30 57 02/26/94 11:11:1 16.3 398.0
- 31 57 02/26/94 16:09:3 13.5 399.7
-
- START OF SYSTEMATIC MAPPING
- 32 57 02/26/94 21:08:0 10.8 401.5
- 33 58 02/27/94 02:06:2 8.1 403.2
- 34 58 02/27/94 07:04:5 5.3 405.1
- 35 58 02/27/94 12:03:1 2.6 406.9
- 36 58 02/27/94 17:01:4 359.9 408.7
- 37 58 02/27/94 22:00:0 357.2 410.5
- 38 59 02/28/94 02:58:3 354.4 412.3
- 39 59 02/28/94 07:57:0 351.7 414.1
- 40 59 02/28/94 12:55:2 349.0 415.8
- 41 59 02/28/94 17:53:5 346.2 417.5
- 42 59 02/28/94 22:52:1 343.5 419.2
- 43 60 03/01/94 03:50:4 340.8 420.8
- 44 60 03/01/94 08:49:0 338.1 422.3
- 45 60 03/01/94 13:47:3 335.3 423.7
- 46 60 03/01/94 18:45:5 332.6 425.0
- 47 60 03/01/94 23:44:2 329.9 426.3
- 48 61 03/02/94 04:42:4 327.2 427.4
- 49 61 03/02/94 09:41:1 324.4 428.4
- 50 61 03/02/94 14:39:3 321.7 429.4
- 51 61 03/02/94 19:37:5 319.0 430.2
- 52 62 03/03/94 00:36:2 316.2 430.9
- 53 62 03/03/94 05:34:4 313.5 431.5
- 54 62 03/03/94 10:33:1 310.8 432.0
- 55 62 03/03/94 15:31:3 308.1 432.4
- 56 62 03/03/94 20:30:0 305.3 432.8
- 57 63 03/04/94 01:28:2 302.6 433.0
- 58 63 03/04/94 06:26:4 299.9 433.2
- 59 63 03/04/94 11:25:1 297.2 433.3
- 60 63 03/04/94 16:23:3 294.4 433.4
- 61 63 03/04/94 21:21:5 291.7 433.4
- 62 64 03/05/94 02:20:2 289.0 433.4
- 63 64 03/05/94 07:18:4 286.2 433.3
- 64 64 03/05/94 12:17:0 283.5 433.3
- 65 64 03/05/94 17:15:3 280.8 433.2
- 66 64 03/05/94 22:13:5 278.1 433.1
- 67 65 03/06/94 03:12:1 275.3 433.0
- 68 65 03/06/94 08:10:4 272.6 432.9
- 69 65 03/06/94 13:09:0 269.9 432.8
- 70 65 03/06/94 18:07:2 267.2 432.8
- 71 65 03/06/94 23:05:5 264.4 432.7
- 72 66 03/07/94 04:04:1 261.7 432.7
- 73 66 03/07/94 09:02:4 259.0 432.8
- 74 66 03/07/94 14:01:0 256.2 432.9
- 75 66 03/07/94 18:59:2 253.5 433.0
- 76 66 03/07/94 23:57:5 250.8 433.2
- 77 67 03/08/94 04:56:1 248.1 433.4
- 78 67 03/08/94 09:54:4 245.3 433.8
- 79 67 03/08/94 14:53:0 242.6 434.1
- 80 67 03/08/94 19:51:3 239.9 434.6
- 81 68 03/09/94 00:49:5 237.2 435.1
- 82 68 03/09/94 05:48:1 234.4 435.6
- 83 68 03/09/94 10:46:4 231.7 436.3
- 84 68 03/09/94 15:45:0 229.0 437.0
- 85 68 03/09/94 20:43:3 226.3 437.7
- 86 69 03/10/94 01:41:5 223.5 438.6
- 87 69 03/10/94 06:40:2 220.8 439.5
- 88 69 03/10/94 11:38:4 218.1 440.4
- 89 69 03/10/94 16:37:1 215.3 441.5
- 90 69 03/10/94 21:35:3 212.6 442.6
- 91 70 03/11/94 02:34:0 209.9 443.7
- 92 70 03/11/94 07:32:2 207.1 444.9
- 93 70 03/11/94 12:30:5 204.4 446.1
- 94 70 03/11/94 17:32:1 201.7 401.4
- 95 70 03/11/94 22:30:3 198.9 402.7
- 96 71 03/12/94 03:29:0 196.2 404.0
- 97 71 03/12/94 08:27:2 193.5 405.3
- 98 71 03/12/94 13:25:4 190.7 406.7
- 99 71 03/12/94 18:24:0 188.0 408.0
- 100 71 03/12/94 23:22:3 185.3 409.3
- 101 72 03/13/94 04:20:5 182.5 410.6
- 102 72 03/13/94 09:19:1 179.8 411.8
- 103 72 03/13/94 14:17:4 177.1 413.1
- 104 72 03/13/94 19:16:0 174.3 414.3
- 105 73 03/14/94 00:14:2 171.6 415.5
- 106 73 03/14/94 05:12:5 168.9 416.7
- 107 73 03/14/94 10:11:1 166.1 417.8
- 108 73 03/14/94 15:09:3 163.4 418.9
- 109 73 03/14/94 20:07:5 160.7 420.0
- 110 74 03/15/94 01:06:2 157.9 421.0
- 111 74 03/15/94 06:04:4 155.2 422.0
- 112 74 03/15/94 11:03:0 152.5 422.9
- 113 74 03/15/94 16:01:3 149.7 423.8
- 114 74 03/15/94 20:59:5 147.0 424.7
- 115 75 03/16/94 01:58:1 144.3 425.5
- 116 75 03/16/94 06:56:3 141.6 426.3
- 117 75 03/16/94 11:55:0 138.8 427.0
- 118 75 03/16/94 16:53:2 136.1 427.7
- 119 75 03/16/94 21:51:4 133.4 428.3
- 120 76 03/17/94 02:50:0 130.6 428.9
- 121 76 03/17/94 07:48:2 127.9 429.4
- 122 76 03/17/94 12:46:5 125.2 429.8
- 123 76 03/17/94 17:45:1 122.5 430.2
- 124 76 03/17/94 22:43:3 119.7 430.6
- 125 77 03/18/94 03:41:5 117.0 430.9
- 126 77 03/18/94 08:40:1 114.3 431.1
- 127 77 03/18/94 13:38:4 111.5 431.3
- 128 77 03/18/94 18:37:0 108.8 431.4
- 129 77 03/18/94 23:35:2 106.1 431.5
- 130 78 03/19/94 04:33:4 103.4 431.6
- 131 78 03/19/94 09:32:0 100.6 431.6
- 132 78 03/19/94 14:30:3 97.9 431.6
- 133 78 03/19/94 19:28:5 95.2 431.5
- 134 79 03/20/94 00:27:1 92.4 431.5
- 135 79 03/20/94 05:25:3 89.7 431.4
- 136 79 03/20/94 10:23:5 87.0 431.3
- 137 79 03/20/94 15:22:1 84.3 431.3
- 138 79 03/20/94 20:20:3 81.5 431.2
- 139 80 03/21/94 01:19:0 78.8 431.1
- 140 80 03/21/94 06:17:2 76.1 431.1
- 141 80 03/21/94 11:15:4 73.3 431.0
- 142 80 03/21/94 16:14:0 70.6 431.0
- 143 80 03/21/94 21:12:2 67.9 431.1
- 144 81 03/22/94 02:10:4 65.1 431.2
- 145 81 03/22/94 07:09:0 62.4 431.3
- 146 81 03/22/94 12:07:3 59.7 431.5
- 147 81 03/22/94 17:05:5 56.9 431.7
- 148 81 03/22/94 22:04:1 54.2 432.0
- 149 82 03/23/94 03:02:3 51.5 432.4
- 150 82 03/23/94 08:00:5 48.7 432.8
- 151 82 03/23/94 12:59:1 46.0 433.4
- 152 82 03/23/94 17:57:3 43.3 434.0
- 153 82 03/23/94 22:56:0 40.5 434.7
- 154 83 03/24/94 03:54:2 37.8 435.5
- 155 83 03/24/94 08:52:4 35.1 436.4
- 156 83 03/24/94 13:51:0 32.3 437.4
- 157 83 03/24/94 18:49:2 29.6 438.5
- 158 83 03/24/94 23:47:5 26.9 439.8
- 159 84 03/25/94 04:46:1 24.1 441.1
- 160 84 03/25/94 09:44:3 21.4 442.5
- 161 84 03/25/94 14:42:5 18.7 444.0
- 162 84 03/25/94 19:41:2 15.9 445.6
- 163 85 03/26/94 00:39:4 13.2 447.2
- 164 85 03/26/94 06:36:5 11.3 1007.9
- 165 85 03/26/94 13:00:1 9.5 449.8
- 166 85 03/26/94 17:59:0 6.8 448.6
- 167 85 03/26/94 22:58:0 4.0 447.3
- 168 86 03/27/94 03:56:5 1.3 446.0
- 169 86 03/27/94 08:55:5 358.6 444.7
- 170 86 03/27/94 13:54:5 355.8 443.3
- 171 86 03/27/94 18:53:4 353.2 447.8
- 172 86 03/27/94 23:52:1 350.4 446.4
- 173 86 03/28/94 04:50:4 347.7 445.1
- 174 87 03/28/94 09:49:1 345.0 443.8
- 175 87 03/28/94 14:47:4 342.2 442.5
- 176 87 03/28/94 19:46:1 339.5 441.3
- 177 87 03/29/94 00:44:3 336.8 440.0
- 178 88 03/29/94 05:43:0 334.0 438.9
- 179 88 03/29/94 10:41:3 331.3 437.8
- 180 88 03/29/94 15:40:0 328.5 436.7
- 181 88 03/29/94 20:38:3 325.8 435.7
- 182 88 03/30/94 01:36:5 323.1 434.8
- 183 89 03/30/94 06:35:2 320.3 434.0
- 184 89 03/30/94 11:33:5 317.6 433.2
- 185 89 03/30/94 16:32:1 314.8 432.5
- 186 89 03/30/94 21:30:4 312.1 431.9
- 187 89 03/31/94 02:29:1 309.4 431.3
- 188 90 03/31/94 07:27:4 306.6 430.8
- 189 90 03/31/94 12:26:0 303.9 430.4
- 190 90 03/31/94 17:24:3 301.1 430.1
- 191 90 03/31/94 22:22:5 298.4 429.8
- 192 90 04/01/94 03:21:2 295.7 429.5
- 193 91 04/01/94 08:19:5 292.9 429.3
- 194 91 04/01/94 13:18:1 290.2 429.2
- 195 91 04/01/94 18:16:4 287.5 429.0
- 196 91 04/01/94 23:15:0 284.7 428.9
- 197 91 04/02/94 04:13:3 282.0 428.8
- 198 92 04/02/94 09:11:5 279.3 428.8
- 199 92 04/02/94 14:10:2 276.5 428.7
- 200 92 04/02/94 19:08:5 273.8 428.7
- 201 92 04/03/94 00:07:1 271.1 428.6
- 202 93 04/03/94 05:05:4 268.4 428.6
- 203 93 04/03/94 10:04:0 265.6 428.5
- 204 93 04/03/94 15:02:3 262.9 428.4
- 205 93 04/03/94 20:01:0 260.2 428.3
- 206 93 04/04/94 00:59:2 257.5 428.1
- 207 94 04/04/94 05:57:5 254.7 428.0
- 208 94 04/04/94 10:56:2 252.0 427.7
- 209 94 04/04/94 15:54:4 249.3 427.5
- 210 94 04/04/94 20:53:1 246.6 427.2
- 211 94 04/05/94 01:51:4 243.8 426.9
- 212 95 04/05/94 06:50:0 241.1 426.6
- 213 95 04/05/94 11:48:3 238.4 426.2
- 214 95 04/05/94 16:47:0 235.7 425.8
- 215 95 04/05/94 21:45:2 232.9 425.4
- 216 95 04/06/94 02:43:5 230.2 425.0
- 217 96 04/06/94 07:42:2 227.5 424.5
- 218 96 04/06/94 12:40:5 224.8 424.0
- 219 96 04/06/94 17:39:1 222.0 423.4
- 220 96 04/06/94 22:37:4 219.3 422.8
- 221 96 04/07/94 03:36:1 216.6 422.2
- 222 97 04/07/94 08:34:4 213.9 421.5
- 223 97 04/07/94 13:33:0 211.1 420.8
- 224 97 04/07/94 18:31:3 208.4 420.1
- 225 97 04/07/94 23:30:0 205.7 419.4
- 226 97 04/08/94 04:28:3 203.0 418.6
- 227 98 04/08/94 09:26:5 200.2 417.9
- 228 98 04/08/94 14:25:2 197.5 417.0
- 229 98 04/08/94 19:23:5 194.8 416.2
- 230 98 04/09/94 00:22:2 192.1 415.4
- 231 99 04/09/94 05:20:5 189.3 414.6
- 232 99 04/09/94 10:19:1 186.6 413.7
- 233 99 04/09/94 15:17:4 183.9 412.8
- 234 99 04/09/94 20:16:1 181.1 412.0
- 235 99 04/10/94 01:14:4 178.4 411.1
- 236 100 04/10/94 06:13:1 175.7 410.3
- 237 100 04/10/94 11:11:4 172.9 409.4
- 238 100 04/10/94 16:10:0 170.2 408.6
- 239 100 04/10/94 21:08:3 167.5 407.7
- 240 100 04/11/94 02:07:0 164.7 406.9
- 241 101 04/11/94 07:05:3 162.0 427.7
- 242 101 04/11/94 12:04:0 159.3 426.9
- 243 101 04/11/94 17:02:3 156.5 426.1
- 244 101 04/11/94 22:01:0 153.8 425.2
- 245 101 04/12/94 02:59:3 151.1 424.4
- 246 102 04/12/94 07:58:0 148.3 423.6
- 247 102 04/12/94 12:56:3 145.6 422.8
- 248 102 04/12/94 17:55:0 142.9 422.0
- 249 102 04/12/94 22:53:3 140.1 421.3
- 250 102 04/13/94 03:52:0 137.4 420.5
- 251 103 04/13/94 08:50:3 134.7 419.9
- 252 103 04/13/94 13:49:0 131.9 419.2
- 253 103 04/13/94 18:47:2 129.2 418.6
- 254 103 04/13/94 23:45:5 126.5 418.1
- 255 103 04/14/94 04:44:2 123.7 417.5
- 256 104 04/14/94 09:42:5 121.0 417.1
- 257 104 04/14/94 14:41:2 118.3 416.6
- 258 104 04/14/94 19:39:5 115.5 416.3
- 259 105 04/15/94 00:38:1 112.8 415.9
- 260 105 04/15/94 05:36:4 110.1 415.6
- 261 105 04/15/94 10:35:1 107.3 415.3
- 262 105 04/15/94 15:33:4 104.6 415.1
- 263 105 04/15/94 20:32:1 101.9 414.9
- 264 106 04/16/94 01:30:4 99.1 414.7
- 265 106 04/16/94 06:29:1 96.4 414.6
- 266 106 04/16/94 11:27:3 93.7 414.5
- 267 106 04/16/94 16:26:0 90.9 414.4
- 268 106 04/16/94 21:24:3 88.2 414.3
- 269 107 04/17/94 02:23:0 85.5 414.2
- 270 107 04/17/94 07:21:3 82.8 414.2
- 271 107 04/17/94 12:19:5 80.0 414.1
- 272 107 04/17/94 17:18:2 77.3 414.1
- 273 107 04/17/94 22:16:5 74.6 414.1
- 274 108 04/18/94 03:15:2 71.9 414.0
- 275 108 04/18/94 08:13:4 69.1 414.0
- 276 108 04/18/94 13:12:1 66.4 413.9
- 277 108 04/18/94 18:10:4 63.7 413.9
- 278 108 04/18/94 23:09:1 61.0 413.8
- 279 109 04/19/94 04:07:3 58.2 413.6
- 280 109 04/19/94 09:06:0 55.5 413.5
- 281 109 04/19/94 14:04:3 52.8 413.3
- 282 109 04/19/94 19:03:0 50.1 413.1
- 283 110 04/20/94 00:01:3 47.3 412.8
- 284 110 04/20/94 04:59:5 44.6 412.4
- 285 110 04/20/94 09:58:2 41.9 412.0
- 286 110 04/20/94 14:56:5 39.2 411.6
- 287 110 04/20/94 19:55:2 36.4 411.1
- 288 111 04/21/94 00:53:5 33.7 410.5
- 289 111 04/21/94 05:52:2 31.0 409.8
- 290 111 04/21/94 10:50:5 28.3 409.1
- 291 111 04/21/94 15:49:1 25.6 408.3
- 292 111 04/21/94 20:47:4 22.8 407.4
- 293 112 04/22/94 01:46:1 20.1 406.5
- 294 112 04/22/94 06:44:4 17.4 405.5
- 295 112 04/22/94 11:43:1 14.7 404.4
- 296 112 04/22/94 16:41:4 11.9 403.2
- 297 112 04/22/94 21:40:1 9.2 402.0
-
- START OF POST-MAPPING ACTIVITIES
- 298 113 04/23/94 02:38:4 6.5 400.8
- 299 113 04/23/94 07:37:1 3.7 399.5
- 300 113 04/23/94 12:35:4 1.0 398.2
- 301 113 04/23/94 17:34:1 358.3 396.8
- 302 113 04/23/94 22:32:5 355.6 395.4
- 303 114 04/24/94 03:31:2 352.8 394.0
- 304 114 04/24/94 08:29:5 350.1 392.6
- 305 114 04/24/94 13:28:2 347.4 391.2
- 306 114 04/24/94 18:26:5 344.6 389.8
- 307 114 04/24/94 23:25:2 341.9 388.4
- 308 115 04/25/94 04:23:5 339.2 387.1
- 309 115 04/25/94 09:22:2 336.4 385.8
- 310 115 04/25/94 14:20:5 333.7 384.5
- 311 115 04/25/94 19:19:2 330.9 383.3
- 312 116 04/26/94 00:17:5 328.2 382.1
- 313 116 04/26/94 05:16:2 325.5 381.0
- 314 116 04/26/94 10:14:5 322.7 380.0
- 315 116 04/26/94 15:13:2 320.0 379.0
- 316 116 04/26/94 20:11:5 317.2 378.1
- 317 117 04/27/94 01:10:2 314.5 377.4
- 318 117 04/27/94 06:08:4 311.8 376.7
- 319 117 04/27/94 11:07:1 309.0 376.0
- 320 117 04/27/94 16:05:4 306.3 375.5
- 321 117 04/27/94 21:04:1 303.5 375.0
- 322 118 04/28/94 02:02:4 300.8 374.6
- 323 118 04/28/94 07:01:1 298.1 374.3
- 324 118 04/28/94 11:59:3 295.3 374.0
- 325 118 04/28/94 16:58:0 292.6 373.8
- 326 118 04/28/94 21:56:3 289.9 373.6
- 327 119 04/29/94 02:55:0 287.1 373.5
- 328 119 04/29/94 07:53:2 284.4 373.3
- 329 119 04/29/94 12:51:5 281.7 373.3
- 330 119 04/29/94 17:50:2 278.9 373.2
- 331 119 04/29/94 22:48:4 276.2 373.1
- 332 120 04/30/94 03:47:1 273.5 373.1
- 333 120 04/30/94 08:45:4 270.7 373.0
- 334 120 04/30/94 13:44:1 268.0 373.0
- 335 120 04/30/94 18:42:3 265.3 372.9
- 336 120 04/30/94 23:41:0 262.6 372.8
- 337 121 05/01/94 04:39:3 259.8 372.7
- 338 121 05/01/94 09:38:0 257.1 372.6
- 339 121 05/01/94 14:36:2 254.4 372.4
- 340 121 05/01/94 19:34:5 251.7 372.2
- 341 122 05/02/94 00:33:2 248.9 371.9
- 342 122 05/02/94 05:31:5 246.2 371.6
- 343 122 05/02/94 10:30:2 243.5 371.2
- 344 122 05/02/94 15:28:5 240.8 370.9
- 345 122 05/02/94 20:27:2 238.0 370.5
- 346 123 05/03/94 01:25:4 235.3 370.1
- 347 123 05/03/94 06:24:1 232.6 369.6
- 348 123 05/03/94 11:22:4 229.9 369.1
- 349 123 05/03/94 16:21:1 227.2 368.5
- 350 123 05/03/94 21:19:4 224.4 367.9
-
-
-